由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
我一直觉得很有趣，为什么有些交易者仍然如此执着于滞后指标，尤其当价格行为完全在喊着别的东西时。我们已经一次又一次地看到了；等到MACD或RSI确认一个走势时，一半的利润已经没了。$WOLF 今天又下跌了10%，跌至40，其交易区间在39.04到46.86之间，这让你不禁想知道是否还有人相信“增长故事”，或者他们只是在等待随机指标交叉来验证显而易见的事实。
然后你再看看像 $GBPJPY 这样的货币对，目前在215.47831，在其214.641–215.70319的区间内上涨了0.23%。一帆风顺，但潜在的叙事可能变化得如此之快。我们是不是过度思考了微观层面，还是那些指标的忠实信徒真的看到了别人没有看到的东西？我真的很想知道是否还有人觉得这些工具在当前这种震荡行情中仍有显著优势。请提出不同意见。
That's a really interesting point about lagging indicators. I'm still trying to figure out how to best use them without getting caught flat-footed. Do you mostly focus on raw price action then, or are there specific setups you look for?
That's a really interesting point about lagging indicators. I'm still trying to figure out how to best use them, or if focusing on price action is always the better way. Do you ever use them at all, maybe just for confirmation on very specific setups?
I think it's less about clinging to lagging indicators and more about the challenge of confirming a shift in narrative. While price action is key, there's always the question of whether the current drop is a true reversal or just a deep pullback before another leg up, especially with $WOLF's historical volatility.
Traderforum · 简体中文