再质押协议的崛起

Are the slashing conditions really that different from traditional PoS, or is it just the multiple layers that make it seem riskier? I think the benefits might outweigh the perceived increase in risk if implemented correctly.

Good point on the smart contract vulnerabilities. With so much value potentially locked, a single bug could have massive implications across multiple protocols.

I agree that the capital efficiency is a huge draw, but the slashing conditions are definitely my main concern. It feels like we're adding layers of complexity without fully understanding the cascading risks.