由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
开始深入研究小型专业基金的AML要求，特别是那些处理不常见资产类别甚至新型数字资产的基金。我试图了解对所有交易对手（不仅仅是直接投资者）进行客户尽职调查（CDD）和强化尽职调查（EDD）的实际期望。例如，在与非常特定的利基服务提供商打交道，甚至是独特的智能合约协议交互时，其他人会深入到什么程度来识别最终受益所有权？是否存在一个常识性的门槛或被广泛接受的基于风险的方法，以避免无限循环的识别，同时又不损害合规性？
This is a great point. For niche asset classes, the definition of "high risk" for EDD can be really subjective, especially when you're looking at counterparties that might not have a traditional regulatory footprint. What specific types of digital assets are you considering, as that often dictates a whole different set of considerations?
This is a great question. For niche assets, the 'source of wealth' check can get particularly tricky. How are you approaching verification for non-traditional capital sources?
For smaller funds, the level of granularity often comes down to your jurisdiction's regulator and the specific risks they've flagged for your asset class. It's not always a one-size-fits-all, especially with newer digital assets where the guidance can be a bit behind.
Traderforum · 简体中文