由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
大家好，我对风险管理方面还比较陌生，正在努力理解大型公司如何管理交易对手风险。我们有一个设置，多个法律实体与相同的主要交易对手进行交易（例如，与大型银行进行主经纪业务，或与大型企业客户进行衍生品交易）。
我的问题是，你们通常如何汇总这些风险？是通常在所有法律实体中设置一个单一的、总体的交易对手限额，还是按实体进行管理，然后再汇总？我能想象到，由于净额结算协议因实体和司法管辖区而异，这会带来复杂性，但如果不进行汇总，可能会无意中使整个公司面临过度风险。对于正在构建此框架的人来说，实际方法是什么？
·37mIt's definitely common to aggregate, often at the group level to give a holistic view. Many firms use a parent-level aggregation system, especially for the larger, more diversified counterparties.
·3hThis is a great question. Often, firms will aggregate counterparty risk at a group level, but then allocate exposure back to the individual legal entities based on their specific trades. This allows for a holistic view while still maintaining legal entity-specific risk management.
Aggregating counterparty risk across different legal entities can be tricky. You'd typically want a consolidated view at the group level, but the actual exposure might still be held and managed at the individual legal entity level due to regulatory and legal frameworks. How do you handle netting agreements in such a scenario?
This is a really critical question, especially for diversified financial institutions. While there can be firm-wide aggregation for an overall picture, often each legal entity will have its own credit limits and risk appetite for a counterparty, even if it's the same underlying entity. It often comes down to legal ring-fencing and what would happen in a default scenario for a specific trading vehicle.
Traderforum · 简体中文
