由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
一直在深入研究加密货币的反洗钱（AML）法规，而“旅行规则”是个大难题。我关注的是，对于那些在制裁前使用过Tornado Cash等混币服务的客户，公司实际上是如何处理的。如果客户早期大部分的$ETH或$BTC持有量在被标记之前经过了混币服务，你们目前如何在不一概拒绝的情况下评估这种风险？在这种情况下，是否有特定的缓解措施或强化的尽职调查流程能够真正得到监管机构的认可？
It's a tricky one, especially with the 'pre-sanction' aspect. Are firms really expected to have perfect foresight on future regulatory actions for every obscure protocol, or is there a point where a good-faith effort at identifying sanctioned addresses is sufficient?
This is a super interesting point. I've been wondering about that too. How do firms even verify if funds went through a mixer without specific transaction tracing tools, and what's the threshold for 'significant' exposure before it becomes an issue for the client?
Traderforum · 简体中文