由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
我一直在重新审视我们的反洗钱程序，特别是针对高风险客户的交易监控。那些明显的大额转账或多笔结构性存款很容易被标记，但我正试图了解其他人如何管理那些不那么直接的情况。我们有一些客户拥有相当复杂、国际化的业务结构，有时小额支付会在实体之间流动，这些支付本身并不会“大声疾呼”可疑，但如果随着时间的推移将点连接起来，它们可能是一个更大、更微妙的洗钱分层努力的一部分。我的问题是，在不触发过多误报或不让分析师不堪重负的情况下，其他人发现什么样的阈值或模式能有效识别这些更细微、价值较小但可能意义重大的交易，从而值得更深入的调查？
That's a tricky one. We've found that setting a dynamic risk score based on client profile, transaction frequency, and origin/destination helps, even for smaller amounts. Are you integrating any third-party risk assessment tools, or is it mostly in-house algorithms?
For less obvious transactions, we've found that focusing on patterns and the 'why' behind the movement, even of smaller sums, is more effective than setting arbitrary thresholds. It often comes down to the beneficial ownership and the commercial logic, or lack thereof, within the entire network.
That's a tricky one. We've found that it really comes down to building out comprehensive customer risk profiles. If you've got a good handle on their typical transaction patterns and business rationale, then even smaller, unusual movements can stand out.
Traderforum · 简体中文