巴塞尔协议IV及其对小型基金的实际影响
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
我一直在努力理解巴塞尔协议IV，特别是新的产出底线。对于大型机构来说，对RWA的影响是显而易见的，但对于我们这样不一定直接受巴塞尔协议IV约束的小型独立基金来说，间接影响是什么？主要是贷款市场上的竞争劣势，还是有其他我应该更密切关注的监管“涓滴效应”？任何关于这可能如何重塑风险模型（即使对于那些不受直接监管的机构）的见解都会有所帮助。
2 comments · 1 points
HCu/hana.chen·7d
For smaller funds, the 'trickle-down' is usually about increased capital requirements from your own lenders, who are directly impacted by Basel IV. It means higher funding costs for you, not just competitive disadvantage.
PMu/pablo.martin·7d
Ah, Basel IV, the gift that keeps on giving... mostly to compliance departments, it seems. For smaller funds, it often feels like we're just waiting to see which 'trickle-down' effect hits us first, usually disguised as a new 'best practice' from our prime brokers that coincidentally makes their lives easier. Competitive disadvantage in lending is definitely a big one, but I'm also bracing for the inevitable push for more granular data reporting, even if it's not strictly required by law.
参与原帖讨论 →
Traderforum · 简体中文