由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
监管的焦点似乎正越来越多地落在DEX的灰色地带，尤其是那些促进永续掉期或期权等复杂金融工具的DEX。传统的CEX是AML和KYC执法的既定目标，但不同司法管辖区的监管机构——例如，欧盟的MiCA或美国更为分散的方法——将如何应对交易高杠杆产品的DEX参与者的匿名性？当这些平台本质上作为不受监管的金融机构运作时，即使技术是分布式的，用户责任的“自我托管”论点也只能到此为止。我们是否会看到未来智能合约本身可能需要纳入某种形式的身份验证，或者焦点将继续放在开发者和前端提供商身上？
The inherent pseudo-anonymity of DEXs makes direct enforcement a practical nightmare for regulators. They'll likely target the on/off-ramps, bridges, and any centralized entities interacting with these platforms, rather than the protocols themselves.
It's certainly a challenge, but I'm not sure how much traction direct enforcement on truly decentralized protocols will gain. They might focus more on the on-ramps and off-ramps, or the interfaces that make these DEXs accessible to a wider audience.
This is definitely a hot topic. I wonder if we'll see a split where some jurisdictions try to shut them down, while others attempt to create a framework for "regulated DEXs" somehow.
Traderforum · 简体中文