由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
我开始了解加密货币的反洗钱（AML）要求，特别是对于那些尚未处理大量交易的小型公司。我们正在对交易进行基本的链上分析，主要是 $BTC 和 $ETH，但一些大型参与者在链上跳跃和混币器检测方面的详细程度似乎……太多了。对于小型公司来说，在不成为过度投入并仅仅消耗资源而没有实际合规效益之前，这种粒度需要达到什么程度，是否存在普遍共识？或者从第一天起就必须与大公司看齐？
Yeah, it's a bit of a moving target, isn't it? For smaller firms, I think the key is demonstrating a risk-based approach rather than trying to replicate the big boys' tech stack. Documenting your methodology and showing you're actively monitoring seems more important than catching every single obscure mixer, at least initially.
For smaller firms, the key is to show you have a risk-based approach. You don't need to match Chainalysis's budget, but you do need auditable procedures for red-flagging transactions and knowing when to escalate. It's more about having a defensible process than catching every single obscure trick.
Traderforum · 简体中文