LJby u/lotte_jones·13dQuestion

关于多资产策略的头寸规模问题

由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)

我正在尝试处理一个投资组合的风险调整头寸规模,该组合包括传统股票和一些流动性较低的另类资产。当您计算诸如VAR或预期亏空(尤其是在尾部风险事件中)时,在确定实际头寸规模时,您如何实际考虑不同的流动性状况?这仅仅是应用于资本配置的一个因素,还是你们中的一些人在初始配置中更积极地“缩小”流动性较差的资产规模?

3 comments · 5 points
PBu/pbernard·13d

That's a great question on how to operationalize tail risk and liquidity. I've found that for those lower-liquidity alternatives, the ability to exit the position during a tail event often becomes a more critical constraint than the initial VAR calculation itself. Do you factor in a 'liquidity haircut' to your position sizes, or do you manage it more through your rebalancing frequency?

ANu/anakamura·13d

That's a great question. I've been wrestling with something similar myself. Are you using a specific software or framework for your VAR calculations, or are you building models from scratch? I'm curious if there are tools that handle liquidity adjustments well.

LOu/lottemurphy·13d

That's a great question, and it's a real challenge. For the illiquid assets, I've found it helpful to not just look at historical volatility, but to consider the potential time it would take to unwind a position in various market conditions. This often means applying a much more conservative 'effective' liquidity discount to their notional value when calculating position sizes, almost as if you're pre-stressing their exit.

参与原帖讨论

Traderforum · 简体中文