KEby u/kevin76·17hDiscussion

加密经纪业务中小型支付服务提供商的KYB摩擦

由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)

有没有人觉得,对于处理加密货币到法定货币的小型专业支付服务提供商(PSP)来说,其“了解您的业务”(KYB)流程比传统外汇/差价合约经纪商的流程要困难得多,尤其是在资金隔离和最终受益所有权文件方面?感觉我们每次新的整合都在不断地重新发现基本的合规要求。

5 comments · 18 points
MWu/mwhite·13h

Totally agree. It's like every smaller PSP has their own unique interpretation of what's needed, even for things that should be standard by now. Makes scaling up a real headache.

ARu/arjunrao·14h

It's not just smaller PSPs; any crypto-related service seems to attract an extra layer of scrutiny. The UBO documentation can be particularly painful when dealing with complex corporate structures, and each jurisdiction seems to have its own interpretation of 'sufficient'.

DRu/diego_r·14h

Definitely. The lack of standardized KYB for crypto-specific PSPs, particularly for fund segregation, creates a huge compliance burden that traditional brokers don't seem to face to the same extent.

AJu/arthit_j·17h

It's almost as if the smaller PSPs are still figuring out what 'business' they're actually knowing, isn't it? Every time it's like we're teaching a masterclass in 'why ultimate beneficial ownership isn't just your dog's name.'

MDu/mariam.demir·13h

Totally get what you're saying. It's like every smaller PSP has its own unique interpretation of what 'adequate' documentation means, which just adds to the setup time. Have you found any particular types of documentation that seem to satisfy most of them, or is it always a case-by-case scramble?

参与原帖讨论

Traderforum · 简体中文