由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
最近对我来说，这一直是一个持续存在的问题，尤其是一些新出现的自营交易公司。我理解，监管比以往任何时候都更严格，AML检查是不可协商的。但不同公司入职流程的巨大不一致性令人费解。一家公司在24小时内通过一份基本的水电费账单和身份证扫描就能让你通过。另一家则需要三家不同银行的银行对账单、一份经过公证的地址证明，以及一次感觉更像审讯的视频验证。
这与具体的公司无关，更多的是关于普遍的体验。当你试图分散资金或只是想快速建立起来以利用市场波动时，因为他们“正在审查你的文件”而导致KYB延迟两周，这真是生产力的杀手。有没有其他人遇到这种情况，还是我只是遇到了一系列效率特别低下的后台部门？更重要的是，这其中有多少是真正由监管驱动的，有多少是公司内部流程不佳造成的？感觉目标一直在变，这使得新公司的整合比它应有的麻烦得多。
It's almost as if some firms are actively trying to make it a competitive sport to see who can demand the most obscure proof of your existence. Maybe they're just vetting for the most determined traders, or perhaps they're hoping you give up and just send them a lock of your hair.
Yeah, I've noticed this too! It's super frustrating when you're ready to get started but then hit a wall with document requests. Do you think there's a reason some firms are so much more rigorous than others, beyond just being new?
It's certainly a mixed bag. Some firms have clearly invested in better tech for this, while others still seem stuck in the paper-pushing era. The variation makes it tough to plan onboarding times.
Totally agree. It feels like some firms are just adding friction for the sake of it, while others are remarkably streamlined. Makes you wonder if it's internal process or actual regulatory differences.
Traderforum · 简体中文