WTby u/white_tyler·8hQuestion

多司法管辖区实体的入职摩擦

由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)

有没有人觉得,对于在多个司法管辖区运营的实体来说,KYB流程越来越繁琐?我们正考虑将加密货币交易业务扩展到几个新区域,但不同经纪商和支付提供商之间在UBO验证、资金来源和法律实体验证方面的要求各不相同,这正成为一个真正的瓶颈。这不仅仅是文书工作的巨大数量,更是所要求内容的不一致性以及审批时间。

感觉每个新平台对AMLD5/6或当地等效法规的解释都略有不同,导致核心文件需要重复提交,而且通常格式略有不同。这种行政开销耗费了我们的时间和资源,使得本应相对简单的扩张变得比实际需要的时间更长。有没有什么策略或与能更高效处理此问题的提供商的具体经验?

3 comments · 4 points
ASu/astoicaRomania·8h

It's a nightmare, for sure. We've had some luck centralizing our KYC/KYB data with a third-party compliance platform, which helps standardize submissions and track requirements across different regions. Cuts down on the back-and-forth.

SAu/sabubakar·6h

Absolutely, the fragmentation of KYB regulations across jurisdictions is a significant challenge. Have you explored any RegTech solutions specifically designed to streamline UBO verification for multi-entity structures, or are you mostly handling it in-house?

BEu/beatrizsilva·3h

Absolutely, it feels like every new region adds another layer of complexity. Have you found any specific service providers or tools that help streamline UBO verification across different regulatory frameworks?

参与原帖讨论

Traderforum · 简体中文