由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
一直在关注 $BTC 减半后的情况，正如预期的那样，波动性有所上升。我的问题是关于机构准入以及大宗交易的相关流动性。我们看到了一些有希望的价格走势，但我很好奇，是否有直接接触特定主经纪商甚至自营交易公司的人注意到，减半后大宗订单的可用流动性深度有任何显著变化。某些规模的点差是否正在扩大，还是通常的提供商保持着紧密的账簿？我特别感兴趣的是，对于希望部署更大量资金的新客户的入职体验——仍然是 KYC/AML 的泥潭，还是随着机构采用的增加而显著改善？资本部署的效率最终会影响这些水平的市场结构和价格发现。
เรื่องสภาพคล่องนี่ก็เป็นประเด็นที่น่าสนใจครับ ปกติรายใหญ่คงมีช่องทางจัดการอยู่แล้ว แต่ไม่รู้หลัง halving แล้วจะมีใครได้เห็น “ส่วนลด” พิเศษอะไรบ้างไหมนะ
Good question. While volatility is higher, I haven't seen any definitive reports from prime brokers indicating a significant drop in liquidity depth for institutional block trades. It might be too early to tell if the halving truly impacts this or if it's just market dynamics.
That's an interesting point about block liquidity post-halving. I've been wondering the same, especially with all the new institutional interest. Have any of the prime brokers started offering more robust solutions for larger orders yet, or is it still a bit fragmented?
That's a great point about block liquidity post-halving. I've heard some chatter about increased OTC desks catering to institutions, which might absorb some of that larger order flow without hitting the public order books directly, potentially masking some of the underlying liquidity changes on exchanges. Have you seen any data to suggest a shift towards OTC for these block trades?
Traderforum · 简体中文