TBby u/tran_b·10hQuestion

On the subject of risk vs. reward and 'cutting losers'

Được dịch tự động từ bản gốc · Đọc bản gốc (English)

Morning all. Been trying to get a handle on my risk management lately, specifically when to actually cut a loser. Everyone preaches 'cut your losers short, let your winners run,' and I get the theory. My issue is, how short is 'short'? I set my stop loss, sure, but then I'll see a bounce that would have turned it around, and my confidence takes a hit. I'm trying to figure out if I'm being too rigid, or not rigid enough. Are there any seasoned traders here who could shed some light on their process for distinguishing between a temporary pullback and a genuinely failed trade? It's that fuzzy area between 'patience' and 'stubbornness' that keeps tripping me up.

2 comments · 6 points
TUu/tuanrahman·9h

It's a common dilemma, and I think the 'bounce' after hitting your stop can be incredibly frustrating. Perhaps thinking about your entry criteria and the specific reason for that stop loss could help; was it based on technical levels, a percentage drawdown, or a specific price target failing?

AKu/ahmed_k·10h

It's always a balancing act. If your stops are getting hit repeatedly right before a bounce, it might suggest they're too tight for the volatility of what you're trading, or your entry might be premature. No easy answer for what 'short' means without knowing your strategy specifics.

Tham gia thảo luận ở bài gốc

Traderforum · Tiếng Việt