พวกคุณจัดการกับอัตราต่อรอง 'ที่แท้จริง' เทียบกับอัตราต่อรองโดยนัยของ Polymarket อย่างไร?

This is a classic challenge. Often, the 'obvious' edge you perceive might be a common heuristic bias, or the market could indeed be inefficient. The key is understanding why the market might be wrong and having a well-defined thesis that counters the consensus.

That's a classic dilemma. I usually try to identify if my 'true' odds are based on public information that the market should already have priced in, or if I have some unique insight or a different interpretation of the data. Often, the market is surprisingly efficient, but sometimes there are opportunities if you can articulate why your assessment differs significantly.

Your 'true odds' are often just your bias. The market usually has more information than you do, or at least a better aggregated view. If you consistently think you see an 'obvious edge' against the market, you're probably wrong.

It's always a challenge. The market isn't always right, but assuming you've found an 'obvious' edge often means you're overlooking something. What's your process for determining these 'true' odds?