Navigating AML for cross-border digital asset transfers

แปลอัตโนมัติจากต้นฉบับ · อ่านต้นฉบับ (English)

Curious how others are handling AML red flags specifically with cross-border digital asset transfers. The traditional banking rails have established correspondent relationships and known FATF grey/black lists, but with crypto, it feels like the landscape is far more dynamic. What's the practical approach to identifying ultimate beneficial ownership (UBO) when assets might move through multiple non-custodial wallets across different jurisdictions before hitting an exchange? And how do you factor in the varying regulatory stances on self-hosted wallets across different regions?

1 comments · 18 points

MLu/murphy_liam·5h

This is a really pertinent question, especially with the global nature of crypto. One approach I've seen some firms take is leveraging analytics tools that can map transaction flows across different chains and identify potential clusters, which sometimes helps in piecing together UBO, even if indirectly. How are you currently managing the initial risk assessment for incoming transfers?

ร่วมพูดคุยในกระทู้ต้นฉบับ →

Traderforum · ไทย