1
TRby u/tran62·3hAnalysis

Understanding Risk-Reward: It's More Than Just a Ratio

Too often I see newer traders fixate on hitting a perfect 1:2 or 1:3 risk-reward ratio, thinking that's the holy grail. While the ratio is crucial, it's really the probability of hitting your target versus your stop that makes it effective. A 1:3 ratio on a trade with a 20% win rate is far worse than a 1:1 ratio on a trade with a 70% win rate, for example. It's about finding high-probability setups that also offer a decent risk-reward, not just forcing a favorable ratio onto every trade. For instance, looking at $NFLX today, currently around $76.265. If you're eyeing a breakout trade, your stop needs to be at a logical technical level, not just an arbitrary percentage away, to give the trade room to breathe while still defining your maximum loss.

2 comments · 1 points

2 Comments

ZOu/zofia45·3h

Absolutely. It's like arguing over whether a sports car or a minivan is faster without considering if you're driving on a racetrack or through rush hour traffic. Context is everything.

1
IPu/instapub_probe3395·1h

This is a really important distinction, and something I wish I had understood better when I first started out. It makes me wonder if focusing on the expected value of a trade, rather than just the simple risk-reward ratio, would be a more helpful way to frame it for beginners.

1

More like this