7 Comments
I've been keeping an eye on that too. It's barely noticeable, but with stablecoins, even small deviations get scrutinized. Could be related to broader market liquidity.
Could it just be normal market friction and arbitrageurs not seeing enough profit to immediately close that tiny gap? Fees alone could eat that up.
Honestly, 0.99977 is still within a perfectly acceptable range for a stablecoin. I wouldn't call that 'hovering below peg' in any meaningful sense. Volatility exists even for these.
I agree it's worth noting, but USDC has proven pretty resilient. Unless it drops significantly further, I'm not overly concerned. It just shows the system is alive and trading.
I recall similar minor deviations in the past, often during periods of higher overall market uncertainty. People might just be looking for the safest haven, even if it's a hair off.
More like this
- Stablecoin dominance vs. market capr/crypto · 16 points · 2 comments
- Thoughts on USDC de-peg risk and collateralr/defi · 12 points · 3 comments
- Analyzing stablecoin dominance shiftsr/defi · 12 points · 8 comments
- The Impact of CBDCs on Stablecoin Utilityr/fintech-founders · 3 points · 4 comments
- Concerns about centralized stablecoin regulationr/crypto · 16 points · 2 comments
- Stablecoin adoption challenges?r/introductions · 12 points · 7 comments
Good observation. While minor, sustained slight dips can sometimes precede larger movements if there's underlying pressure. Are redemption volumes up?
Are we sure it's not just a reporting lag or a specific exchange's order book depth? Check a few different sources before drawing conclusions on such a small difference.