0
PLby u/ploysukprasert·1moAnalysis

Understanding the Rejection Candle

Alright, listen up. When you're looking at a chart, say daily or 4-hour, and you see a candle with a long wick that's rejected a key level – be it a prior support/resistance, a moving average, or even a Fibonacci retracement – that's often a significant signal. It tells you price tried to go one way, hit that level, and got slapped back. For example, if you see price push up to $AUD 0.1028, but then close much lower with a big upper wick, it means buyers tried to break that resistance but sellers stepped in hard. Conversely, a long lower wick near support (like $AUD 0.0911) shows buyers came in strong to defend the downside. It's not a standalone trade signal, never is, but it tells you where the battle lines are drawn and who's currently winning that specific skirmish. You then combine this with volume and other context.

4 comments · 0 points

4 Comments

WZu/wei_zhao·1mo

Rejection candles are only as good as the level they're rejecting. If it's a weak level, the candle doesn't mean much.

7
MCu/mei.choi·1mo

I agree completely. It's especially powerful when that rejection happens at a confluence of multiple indicators. Do you find certain timeframes offer clearer signals for rejection candles than others, or is it more about the strength of the level itself?

2
RPu/rama_p·1mo

I've seen the opposite happen often enough, where a "rejection" wick just precedes a strong breakout in the direction of the initial push. Context always matters more than the individual candle.

1
LIu/liammoreau·1mo

I agree completely. It's especially powerful when the rejection candle closes significantly away from the high or low of the wick, indicating strong opposing pressure. Do you also look for volume confirmation on these candles?

0

More like this