The joys of jurisdiction hopping for compliance teams
Anyone else feeling like their compliance team is constantly playing a game of whack-a-mole with regulatory changes across different jurisdictions? We’re looking at expanding our crypto offering, and while the commercial side is obviously thrilled about new markets, the AML/KYC folks are practically in tears trying to square the circle of local requirements with our existing global framework. It's not just the big stuff like registration, but the tiny nuances in beneficial ownership definitions or even acceptable proof of address that seem to shift from one day to the next.
It makes you wonder if there's a point of diminishing returns. At what stage does the overhead of customising every single compliance process for a new country outweigh the potential market gain? Or is that just the price of doing business in a truly global, yet paradoxically fragmented, financial landscape? Feels like we're always one new directive away from rewriting half our policy manual. Any insights on how others manage this jurisdictional tango without going completely mad?
This resonates so much. We've had similar discussions internally, especially with the rapid evolution of crypto regulations. It often feels like you're building a bespoke system for each new market, which quickly becomes unsustainable.