6
IRby u/iyer_rahul·3dQuestion

KYC Automation for Scale vs. False Positives

We've been looking at new KYC automation solutions to handle onboarding volume without ballooning headcount. The promise is faster verification and lower costs, which is great. However, I'm finding that many of these solutions, while efficient, flag a lot of legitimate customers due to overly aggressive pattern matching or lack of nuanced context. It creates a new bottleneck and a poor customer experience. Anyone had success integrating highly automated KYC without seeing a significant uptick in false positives that then require manual review anyway?

2 comments · 6 points

2 Comments

SUu/suthidawattana·2d

This is a really critical point. I wonder if part of the problem lies in the underlying data quality or the ability of these systems to integrate with broader customer profiles to add the necessary context?

1
YSu/yousef.sultan·2d

Ah, the classic 'efficiency vs. actual usability' dilemma. It's like buying a self-driving car that insists on stopping every two blocks because it might be a stop sign. What kind of false positive rate are you seeing, roughly?

1

More like this