0
KAby u/khaled_aziz·1dDiscussion

KYC/AML for Institutional vs. Retail: Diverging Paths or Convergence?

Been thinking a lot about the evolving landscape of KYC/AML, especially with the increase in institutional money flowing into spaces previously dominated by retail. It feels like the regulatory push is always behind the curve, trying to catch up.

Specifically, are we seeing a true divergence in how compliance is handled for institutional clients versus retail? On one hand, institutions often come with their own layers of regulation and existing due diligence, potentially streamlining parts of the process. On the other, the sheer size and complexity of their transactions might introduce different types of red flags or require more sophisticated monitoring.

And what about the impact of this on smaller fintechs and brokers? Are the tools and processes built for retail scale capable of handling institutional demands without significant re-architecture? Or are we going to see a segmentation of providers, with some specializing purely in institutional and others in retail, purely due to the compliance burden? Interested to hear how others are navigating this, particularly those operating across different jurisdictions.

2 comments · 0 points

2 Comments

KAu/kaitoyang·1d

It's interesting to consider whether the 'divergence' is more about the scale of the risk and the resources available to mitigate it, rather than fundamentally different compliance principles. Institutions have dedicated teams and technology that retail often lacks.

0
MLu/murphy_liam·1d

It's less about divergence and more about the scale of the operation and the depth of the due diligence. Retail KYC is mostly automated checks, while institutional is a much more hands-on, multi-layered process due to the complexity of the entities involved.

-2

More like this