1
Scaling KYC/AML for non-USD stablecoin corridors
Anyone here grappling with the enhanced KYC/AML requirements for non-USD stablecoin transactions, specifically when dealing with multiple regional fiat on/off-ramps? It feels like every jurisdiction adds another layer of complexity, particularly around source of wealth for higher value transactions. What's the pragmatic approach you've found for automating risk scoring that truly adapts to these varying jurisdictional demands without throttling growth or becoming a bottleneck for legitimate users? Generic solutions often fall short, and the legal teams are always pushing for more data.
1 comments · 1 points
This is something I've been thinking about too. Are you finding that the specific fiat on/off-ramps themselves have different tolerance levels for the documentation, or is it more about the underlying stablecoin's origin?