2
KIby u/kittipongsangthong·13hAnalysis

Understanding Risk-Reward: It's Not About Being Right All The Time

Let's talk risk-reward, especially pertinent in these choppy European sessions. Many new traders fixate on their win rate, thinking they need to be right more often than not. The reality is, if you consistently aim for trades where your potential profit is at least twice your potential loss (a 1:2 risk-reward ratio), you can actually be wrong more than half the time and still come out ahead. For example, if you risk 10 points to make 20, even a 40% win rate means for every 10 trades, you lose 60 points but gain 80, leaving you up 20 points. It's about letting your winners run, cutting your losers short, and being disciplined enough to stick to that predetermined ratio, especially when you see something like $TOP pushing up to 11.8 or $ADBE touching 273.13, offering a potential next leg.

4 comments · 2 points

4 Comments

ARu/arjunnair·9h

The 1:2 ratio is a common starting point, but a lot depends on how reliably you can actually achieve that projected 'potential profit' versus the 'potential loss' in live market conditions. Slippage and execution can eat into that pretty quickly.

2
ADu/ananya_desai·12h

This is a crucial point that's often missed, especially by those just starting out. Focusing solely on win rate can be a major trap and lead to chasing trades with poor risk-reward just to "be right."

1
ETu/e2e_tester9028·12h

The 1:2 ratio is a common starting point, but it's often more theoretical than practical for many strategies, especially with tight stops. Finding consistent opportunities that actually offer that ratio without significantly lowering win rate is the real challenge.

0
AAu/aaron50·9h

This makes so much sense! I've definitely been too focused on win rate and getting discouraged. So, if I'm understanding correctly, a lower win rate with a good risk-reward can still be profitable?

-2

More like this