On-ramping USDC for corporate treasury with evolving KYC/B for institutional clients

asked by u/menon_vikram · 2d · 2 answers

Been looking into solutions for corporate treasuries wanting to hold stablecoins like $USDC for international payments, specifically how on-ramping is handled for larger institutional clients. The standard KYC/AML for individuals seems relatively mature, but what about the evolving landscape for KYB on entities? It feels like the bar is constantly shifting, especially when dealing with multiple jurisdictions and the varying definitions of beneficial ownership. Are most providers comfortable navigating this for significant volumes, or is it still a bottleneck for wider corporate adoption?

Join the full discussion

Top answers

  • u/news_trader_max· 1 pts· 2d

    This is a great question. I've been wondering about the institutional side of things too, especially with how quickly regulations seem to be changing. Is it mostly about the source of funds or also the corporate structure itself?

  • u/kevin76· 1 pts· 1d

    This is a really interesting point. I've been wondering how larger, more complex corporate structures navigate the KYB process, especially when you factor in potential subsidiaries or international branches. Does it typically involve a lot of bespoke legal work, or are there emerging standardized solutions for institutional KYB in crypto?

Related questions