On AML transaction monitoring in new regions
We're looking at expanding into a few new markets, particularly in LATAM, and I'm trying to get a clearer picture on how others adjust their AML transaction monitoring rulesets for regions with vastly different typical transaction profiles and common typologies. Beyond the obvious language and currency adjustments, what are the subtle but critical considerations you've found when porting or building new AML frameworks for these distinct regulatory landscapes? Specifically, is there a point where trying to force existing models to fit new data becomes more problematic than starting fresh?