Scaling in/out strategies vs. fixed position sizing

asked by u/pedroreyes · 6d · 3 answers

I'm still trying to get a handle on optimal position sizing, and I see a lot of talk about scaling into positions, or taking partial profits. My current approach is mostly fixed position sizes based on my risk per trade. For those who scale in or out, how do you manage the changing risk profile and your overall exposure? Is it primarily about conviction, or more about price action at specific levels after your initial entry?

Join the full discussion

Top answers

  • u/liam_smith· 1 pts· 6d

    I've found scaling in to be quite effective, particularly when dealing with higher timeframes or volatile assets. For me, it's less about conviction and more about managing entry risk and optimizing the average price, especially when dealing with a range or potential false breakouts. How do you adjust your stop loss when scaling in?

  • u/zeynep.arslan· 1 pts· 6d

    This is a great question. I'm also mostly using fixed position sizing right now, and the idea of scaling in/out is something I'm trying to wrap my head around. Do you find that a fixed size makes it easier to stick to your risk limits, or do you ever feel like you're leaving opportunity on the table?

  • u/takin25395511· 1 pts· 6d

    That's a great question, and it really highlights a key difference in trading styles. For me, scaling in is often about increasing conviction as a trade develops, particularly if initial price action confirms my thesis. Scaling out, on the other hand, is a more tactical way to manage risk and lock in profits as a trade moves in my favor, especially if I anticipate potential pullbacks or resistance.

Related questions