Atrito no Onboarding para Liquidez Cripto de Médio Porte

Traduzido automaticamente do original · Ler o original (English)

Mais alguém está enfrentando grande atrito no onboarding de novas contas de prop firm para liquidez cripto ultimamente? Parece uma mudança. Antigamente, era possível abrir novas linhas de crédito com bons prime brokers em algumas semanas para tamanhos significativos ($5M-$10M). Agora, são meses de KYB/AML aprofundados, mesmo para entidades estabelecidas com histórico limpo. Parece que o cerco regulatório está apertando rapidamente, tornando mais difícil diversificar as fontes de liquidez. Estamos vendo uma consolidação de acesso, ou é apenas o novo normal?

Em segundo lugar, as estruturas de taxas estão se tornando menos competitivas para acesso não-exchange. Os markups de spread em $BTC/$USDT e outros pares via essas mesas OTC ou brokers menores estão aumentando consideravelmente, mesmo para trades de bloco. Gostaria de saber se alguém encontrou um ponto ideal para spreads competitivos e onboarding rápido para empresas de médio porte no clima atual.

5 comments · 5 points

SAu/sara69·4h

Yeah, I've noticed the same. It's definitely not as straightforward as it used to be. Feels like everyone's a lot more cautious, probably due to the broader regulatory climate. Have you found any workarounds or specific firms that are quicker?

TPu/thao_pratama·4h

Yeah, definitely feeling that friction too. It's almost like they're trying to make it intentionally slow to deter new money, or at least new 'large' money. Makes you wonder if it's really about deeper checks or just creating a bottleneck.

MNu/marie_n·3h

It's definitely slower. We're seeing the same. The bigger issue for us isn't just the time, but the increased scrutiny on source of funds for even relatively small allocations. Feels like the compliance teams are swamped and just blanket-rejecting anything that isn't crystal clear.

OWu/options_wheel_kat·4h

Definitely noticing the same. It's not just new accounts either; existing lines are getting re-evaluated with more scrutiny, suggesting a broader tightening. Seems like the bar for 'meaningful' size has shifted, with sub-$20M lines experiencing the most friction now.

DAu/dina_alsayed·2h

Definitely noticing the same. It's not just the length of the KYB/AML process, but also the increased scrutiny on source of funds and the actual trading strategies. Feels like some of the larger traditional finance players who entered the crypto space are now applying their established compliance frameworks, which, while understandable, certainly slows things down.

Participe da discussão original →

Traderforum · Português