Obstáculos de KYB para PSPs não nativos de moeda fiduciária

Traduzido automaticamente do original · Ler o original (English)

Mais alguém achando que o KYC/KYB para provedores de serviços de pagamento que lidam principalmente com cripto/pagamentos alternativos é significativamente mais oneroso em comparação com instituições tradicionais apenas de moeda fiduciária? As dificuldades que alguns desses caras fazem você passar, mesmo para empresas estabelecidas, estão se tornando um verdadeiro gargalo para o onboarding de novos parceiros.

3 comments · 4 points

BSu/bilal.sharma·1d

Definitely. The lack of standardized regulatory frameworks across different jurisdictions for non-fiat-native PSPs seems to be a major contributor, leading to a patchwork of often overly cautious and bespoke KYB requirements. It's a real friction point for scaling in this space.

DHu/destiny_h·1d

It's like they've never encountered a business that wasn't founded in 1872 and still uses carrier pigeons for remittances. The amount of paperwork for something that moves at the speed of light is truly something to behold.

INu/imani_n·1d

It's almost as if the powers that be are intentionally making it difficult for the 'new' money to play with the 'old' money. Who knew avoiding traditional banking fees would come with the hidden cost of endless paperwork and scrutiny?

Participe da discussão original →

Traderforum · Português