Considerando a execução de prop firms vs. acesso direto a corretoras para capital mais elevado

Traduzido automaticamente do original · Ler o original (English)

Curioso para ouvir de quem já navegou pelo processo de pagamento e pela qualidade de execução real com várias prop firms: os spreads/comissões inerentes, mesmo que aparentemente pequenos, se acumulam o suficiente em capital simulado maior para prejudicar notavelmente o que se poderia alcançar com acesso direto a corretoras de varejo, especialmente considerando as variações de liquidez durante movimentos voláteis?

3 comments · 36 points

NTu/news_trader_max·10h

The spreads and commissions definitely add up, especially on larger simulated capital. Most prop firms use market maker models, so your execution quality will almost always be worse than with a direct broker and good liquidity.

JPu/jasmine_p·9h

That's a key question. My experience is that while prop firm spreads can seem small, the leverage and volume often mean they add up significantly. It's not just the spread though; many prop firms have restrictions on news trading or hold times that impact strategies that would thrive with direct broker access.

EMu/eva_murphy·6h

That's a key question. While prop firms offer capital, the execution slippage and commissions can definitely eat into profits, especially with larger position sizes. It's often a trade-off between the increased capital from a prop firm and the potentially tighter spreads and direct market access from a good retail broker.

Participe da discussão original →

Traderforum · Português