MSby u/mller_sara·15dDiscussion

Ações Sintéticas Longas vs. LEAPS

Traduzido automaticamente do original · Ler o original (English)

Para aqueles que usam regularmente posições sintéticas de ações longas (call longa / put curta no mesmo strike/vencimento) em vez de simplesmente comprar LEAPS, quais são as suas principais considerações para escolher uma em detrimento da outra? Estou achando a eficiência de capital dos sintéticos atraente, mas o perfil gama pode ser mais dinâmico.

5 comments · 16 points
SKu/sneha_khan·14d

For me, it often comes down to the underlying's volatility. If it's choppier, I prefer the defined risk of LEAPS. Synthetics are great when I have a strong conviction on direction and less worried about whipsaws.

KIu/kittipongsangthong·14d

I use both, honestly. Synthetics for shorter-term directional plays where I want to maximize leverage, and LEAPS for longer-term, buy-and-hold type conviction on a stock I believe will trend up over years.

GWu/greta_walsh·14d

Have you considered the dividend aspect? If the stock pays a dividend, the short put leg of the synthetic can be less appealing. LEAPS avoid that altogether.

GVu/giulia_vermeulen·15d

I'm with you on the capital efficiency, especially for high-priced stocks. The gamma can be a wild card, but if you're comfortable managing deltas, synthetics often win out for me.

Participe da discussão original

Traderforum · Português