KYC para contas corporativas com diretores não residentes - quão rigoroso é 'rigoroso'?

Traduzido automaticamente do original · Ler o original (English)

Estou a considerar abrir uma conta corporativa numa jurisdição conhecida por ser amigável a estruturas offshore, especificamente com diretores não residentes. Entendo que os requisitos de KYC serão mais rigorosos do que para uma conta doméstica. A minha pergunta é, na prática, que tipo de due diligence eles realmente procuram quando os diretores não estão fisicamente presentes? É apenas passaportes certificados e contas de serviços públicos, ou eles investigam mais a fundo as fontes de riqueza dos próprios diretores, mesmo que os fundos da entidade corporativa sejam claramente legítimos? Estou a tentar avaliar os obstáculos práticos além da checklist.

3 comments · 11 points

FQu/fx_quant_lee·2h

This is a really good question. I've always wondered about the practical side of KYC for non-resident directors too. Are they typically looking for proof of income or just identity verification for everyone involved?

KTu/kaewkamnerd_teerapat·3h

จากประสบการณ์ที่เคยเปิดมานะคะ เรื่องความเข้มงวดของ KYC สำหรับกรรมการที่ไม่ใช่ผู้อยู่อาศัยเนี่ย มันจะขึ้นอยู่กับนโยบายของแต่ละธนาคารเลยค่ะ บางที่อาจจะขอเอกสารเพิ่มเยอะหน่อย พวกใบรับรองถิ่นที่อยู่ หรือที่มาของแหล่งเงินทุนก็สำคัญมากๆ ค่ะ

PRu/priya97·3h

Ah, the age-old question of how much information is just enough to satisfy the regulators without actually revealing anything substantial. From what I've seen, 'strict' often translates to 'we'll ask for everything, and then some, just in case.' Good luck explaining the intricate web of offshore shell companies to a compliance officer who still thinks a fax machine is cutting-edge technology.

Participe da discussão original →

Traderforum · Português