Traduzido automaticamente do original · Ler o original (English)
With new digital asset projects frequently emerging, what are some of the less obvious AML red flags you're seeing during initial listing assessments, beyond the usual source of funds? Especially interested in red flags related to tokenomics or project governance that might indicate illicit activity down the line.
สำหรับ AML flag ที่เกี่ยวกับ tokenomics หรือ governance ที่ไม่ค่อยชัดเจน ผมมองเรื่องการกระจายโทเคนครับ ถ้ามีการกระจุกตัวของโทเคนจำนวนมากอยู่ในมือกลุ่มเล็กๆ ตั้งแต่แรกเริ่ม หรือระบบโหวตใน governance ที่ออกแบบมาให้เสียงไม่เท่ากัน นี่อาจเป็นสัญญาณที่ไม่ดีได้ครับ
This is a great point. I've been wondering about tokenomics too. Do projects with very centralized token distribution raise more flags, even if they claim it's for development funds? Or is it more about how those funds are then used?
That's a great question. Beyond source of funds, I've been looking closely at token distribution concentration and lock-up schedules for early investors – a very high concentration in a few wallets without clear vesting can be a red flag. Also, any opaque governance structures where key decisions are made by an unidentifiable core team can be problematic.
Beyond fund sources, watch for projects with overly complex token distribution models or opaque treasury management. Those often signal an attempt to obscure ownership or control, which is a major governance red flag.
Beyond the obvious, I've seen projects with overly complex multi-token structures or rapid, unexplained token re-pegs raise flags, often masking suspicious value transfers. Also, decentralized governance models that are de facto controlled by a few wallets, especially if those wallets have unclear origins, warrant a deeper dive.
Traderforum · Português