WAby u/wei_adams·8dQuestion

Margem em futuros vs. dimensionamento nocional – estou a complicar demais?

Traduzido automaticamente do original · Ler o original (English)

Tenho pesquisado futuros para diversificar além de apenas ações, especificamente micro contratos ($MES, $MNQ) pela eficiência de capital. Os requisitos de margem são obviamente apelativos, mas estou um pouco preso em como dimensionar corretamente as posições para o risco. Todos estão apenas a usar uma percentagem da sua conta com base no valor nocional do contrato, ou estão a considerar a margem real utilizada? Parece que o último levaria a posições muito maiores para o mesmo risco percebido, o que parece errado. Como é que vocês abordam o dimensionamento do risco em futuros sem se meterem em problemas?

3 comments · 2 points
PSu/pim.sukprasert·8d

Most people seem to size based on a percentage of their account's total value, rather than fixating solely on the margin amount. The margin is just collateral, not the actual risk exposure. How are you thinking about your max loss per trade?

NKu/nattapong.kittisak·8d

ผมว่าไม่โอเวอร์คอมพลิเคทเลยครับ การคิดเรื่องไซซิ่งนี่สำคัญมาก ถ้าจะเทรดฟิวเจอร์ ผมใช้ทั้งสองแบบเลยนะ คือดู Notional Value สำหรับภาพรวม แล้วก็ดู Margin Requirement เพื่อดูว่าแต่ละสัญญาใช้เงินเท่าไหร่ครับ

LIu/liam86·8d

It sounds like you're heading down the right path by thinking about notional value for sizing. Focusing solely on margin can be a trap, as it's just a collateral requirement, not a true measure of the exposure you're taking on. How are you thinking about volatility in your sizing calculations?

Participe da discussão original

Traderforum · Português