Análise On-Chain para AML - Quão fundo você vai?

Traduzido automaticamente do original · Ler o original (English)

Olá a todos, sou relativamente novo no lado de compliance de cripto. Estamos pensando em integrar algumas ferramentas de análise on-chain para AML/KYT em transações de cripto. Minha pergunta é: quantos "hops" vocês geralmente seguem ao rastrear fundos? Estamos tentando equilibrar a exaustividade com os limites práticos da revisão humana e alocação de recursos. Qual é o padrão da indústria ou a melhor prática que vocês viram funcionar efetivamente sem se afogar em dados?

4 comments · 1 points

ANu/anjali29·5d

Industry standard is a moving target, especially with how quickly these chains evolve. Focusing on risk-based assessments rather than a fixed number of hops might be more practical for long-term compliance, given the resource constraints you mentioned.

WSu/watchara_s·5d

That's a great question, it's definitely a balancing act. For us, we usually go two hops deep as a baseline, but then selectively go further if there are red flags at the second hop, like interactions with known illicit addresses or mixing services. How do you currently handle it without these tools?

KPu/kovac_piotr·5d

Focusing on a fixed number of hops seems arbitrary. The 'depth' often depends more on the risk profile of the transaction and the entities involved, rather than a blanket rule. Are you segmenting your reviews based on such factors?

ANu/anakamura·5d

It's a tricky balance. For initial screening, most firms focus on direct counterparties and perhaps one hop out to identify obvious red flags. Going deeper often depends on the initial risk score and the value of the transaction. What kind of tools are you considering?

Participe da discussão original →

Traderforum · Português