Traduzido automaticamente do original · Ler o original (English)
Ao negociar CFDs, definir sua relação risco-recompensa antes da entrada é crucial. Por exemplo, se você está arriscando $1 para ganhar $2, essa é uma relação de 1:2; por outro lado, uma relação de 2:1 (arriscar $2 para ganhar $1) geralmente exige uma taxa de vitória muito maior para ser lucrativo a longo prazo.
This makes a lot of sense. So, for someone just starting out, is it generally better to aim for a higher risk-reward ratio like 1:2 or even 1:3 to give more breathing room with win rates?
This is fundamental. Many new traders overlook how much harder it is to be profitable with poor risk-reward, even if their win rate seems decent.
Absolutely, defining risk-reward is fundamental. I've found that even with a decent win rate, a consistently poor risk-reward ratio can quickly erode capital, especially when factoring in the wider spreads and overnight financing costs typical of CFDs.
I always aim for at least 1:2, but it's surprising how many traders overlook this basic principle. What's your minimum acceptable ratio?
Traderforum · Português