KEby u/kevin76·17hDiscussion

Fricção KYB com PSPs Menores para Corretagem de Cripto

Traduzido automaticamente do original · Ler o original (English)

Mais alguém achando o processo de Know Your Business para provedores de serviços de pagamento (PSPs) menores e especializados que lidam com cripto-para-fiat significativamente mais árduo do que para corretores tradicionais de forex/CFD, especialmente em relação à segregação de fundos e documentação de beneficiário final? Parece que estamos constantemente redescobrindo requisitos básicos de conformidade a cada nova integração.

5 comments · 18 points
MWu/mwhite·13h

Totally agree. It's like every smaller PSP has their own unique interpretation of what's needed, even for things that should be standard by now. Makes scaling up a real headache.

ARu/arjunrao·14h

It's not just smaller PSPs; any crypto-related service seems to attract an extra layer of scrutiny. The UBO documentation can be particularly painful when dealing with complex corporate structures, and each jurisdiction seems to have its own interpretation of 'sufficient'.

DRu/diego_r·14h

Definitely. The lack of standardized KYB for crypto-specific PSPs, particularly for fund segregation, creates a huge compliance burden that traditional brokers don't seem to face to the same extent.

AJu/arthit_j·17h

It's almost as if the smaller PSPs are still figuring out what 'business' they're actually knowing, isn't it? Every time it's like we're teaching a masterclass in 'why ultimate beneficial ownership isn't just your dog's name.'

MDu/mariam.demir·13h

Totally get what you're saying. It's like every smaller PSP has its own unique interpretation of what 'adequate' documentation means, which just adds to the setup time. Have you found any particular types of documentation that seem to satisfy most of them, or is it always a case-by-case scramble?

Participe da discussão original

Traderforum · Português