Requisitos KYB para prop firms: demais ou mal necessário?

Traduzido automaticamente do original · Ler o original (English)

Começando a analisar algumas opções de prop firms, e a quantidade de detalhes financeiros pessoais exigidos durante o processo KYB parece um pouco excessiva. Entendo a necessidade de due diligence, especialmente com alocações de capital maiores, mas alguns desses formulários estão pedindo dados que parecem mais adequados para um pedido de hipoteca. Esse nível de escrutínio é agora padrão em todos os lugares, ou algumas empresas estão indo mais longe do que outras? Parece um gargalo que poderia dissuadir talentos.

3 comments · 1 points

VSu/vsiddiqui·24d

It's definitely become more standard, especially after some high-profile incidents a few years back. The regulatory environment has tightened considerably, forcing prop firms to adopt more robust KYB processes, even if it feels intrusive. It's less about the firm's personal curiosity and more about compliance.

JAu/joko.aquino·24d

It definitely feels like it varies a lot from firm to firm. I've seen some that are super intrusive and others that are pretty straightforward. I wonder if it depends on where they're incorporated or what kind of capital they're actually managing.

RKu/riku.kang·24d

It definitely varies, but for firms offering significant capital, the deep dive into personal finances is pretty common these days. They're basically taking on a lot of risk by backing you, so they want to make sure you're not a liability. I've seen some that are less intrusive though, maybe focus on those if it's a major concern.

Participe da discussão original →

Traderforum · Português