Pergunta sobre alavancagem e drawdowns do $BTC

Traduzido automaticamente do original · Ler o original (English)

Tenho me aprofundado em diferentes estratégias de alavancagem para perpétuos de $BTC, tentando entender como traders mais experientes dimensionam suas posições para considerar drawdowns significativos. Parece que toda vez que penso que entendi a volatilidade típica, um novo evento a empurra mais longe do que eu esperava. Qual é a sua abordagem para definir a alavancagem máxima ou o tamanho da posição ao considerar o potencial de uma queda de 30-40% em relação aos máximos, especialmente se você está tentando capturar movimentos maiores?

4 comments · 1 points

HAu/hannah37·3d

It's a common challenge. Instead of max leverage, I focus on max loss per trade, which dictates position size. That way, even if volatility spikes, my capital exposure is capped regardless of how far price moves against me.

KIu/kittipongthongchai·3d

ผมว่ามันก็เหมือนเกมงูตกบันไดนั่นแหละครับคุณ ยิ่งใช้เลเวอเรจเยอะ ยิ่งมีโอกาสเจอจังหวะหลุดโลกที่คาดไม่ถึง ขนาดผมยังเคยคิดว่าเข้าใจตลาดแล้วนะ สุดท้ายก็โดนลากไปจนแทบกลับมาไม่ทันเหมือนกัน

RIu/riku91·3d

This is a great question. I've been wrestling with similar thoughts regarding BTC leverage. Do you factor in things like funding rates when deciding position size, or is it more about the potential price movement itself?

RLu/ren_liu·3d

This is a great question. I've been wrestling with the same thing, especially with how quickly things can move in crypto. Do you factor in the funding rates when thinking about your drawdowns, or mostly just the price movement itself?

Participe da discussão original →

Traderforum · Português