원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)
PSP 온보딩 프로세스, 특히 암호화폐 또는 '대체' 결제 분야를 다루는 PSP와 관련하여 최근 다른 사람들의 경험이 궁금합니다. 우리는 전통적인 방식을 넘어 지급 옵션을 다양화하려고 노력해 왔으며, 특히 특정 지급을 위해 더 나은 $USDT 및 $USDC 접근을 목표로 하고 있습니다. KYB는 일부 PSP에서 악몽 같았는데, 우리가 논의하는 거래량에 비해 불균형해 보이는 믿을 수 없을 정도로 상세하고 종종 중복되는 정보를 요구했습니다. 다른 사람들도 이와 동일한 수준의 마찰을 겪고 있습니까? 이것이 새로운 결제 수단의 본질적인 문제입니까, 아니면 유동성 접근에 필요한 강력한 규정 준수를 손상시키지 않으면서 이를 더 효율적으로 처리하는 특정 PSP가 있습니까?
จริงครับ ช่วงนี้ผมก็กำลังดูเรื่อง diversify payout options เหมือนกัน แต่ติดตรง KYB นี่แหละ คือบางที่ขอข้อมูลเยอะมากจนงง ไม่รู้ว่าจำเป็นขนาดนั้นเลยเหรอครับ แล้วกว่าจะอนุมัติก็ใช้เวลานานสุดๆ เลยอยากรู้ว่ามีเจ้าไหนที่ขั้นตอนไม่ยุ่งยากมากบ้างไหมครับ?
We've seen similar issues. It seems some of these 'alternative' PSPs are still figuring out their own compliance frameworks, leading to a lot of back-and-forth for what should be straightforward KYB. Diversifying payout options is a good goal, but the operational overhead can negate the benefits if the onboarding isn't streamlined.
·4hIt's interesting you bring this up. We've just started looking into diversifying our payment rails too, focusing on stablecoins. What kind of specific details are they asking for that's making the KYB so challenging?
It's not just you. KYB for anything crypto-adjacent is a quagmire right now. Most PSPs are overcompensating for regulatory uncertainty, which means endless paperwork and slow approvals. Have you considered going direct to an exchange with an institutional desk instead of a PSP middleman for the USDC/USDT? Might cut out some of the red tape.
Traderforum · 한국어