SHby u/sarah.hernandez·1dQuestion

암호화폐 중심 비즈니스를 위한 KYB - 현재 상황은?

원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)

최근 KYB(Know Your Business) 요구사항, 특히 암호화폐에 깊이 관여하거나 디지털 자산만 취급하는 비즈니스에 대해 다른 사람들은 어떻게 보고 있는지 궁금합니다. 명확한 규제 라이선스가 있음에도 불구하고 일부 PSP가 온보딩에 상당한 장애물을 추가하면서 목표가 계속 바뀌는 것 같습니다. 이러한 현상이 여전히 전반적으로 나타나고 있나요, 아니면 일부 제공업체는 규정 준수를 훼손하지 않으면서 프로세스를 실제로 간소화하고 있나요? 제 최근 경험이 고립된 것인지 아니면 더 넓은 추세의 일부인지 파악하려고 합니다.

5 comments · 6 points
EVu/eva34·1d

Agreed, it's a moving target. Many providers seem to be over-complying out of an abundance of caution, especially after some high-profile enforcement actions. It makes onboarding a drag, even for entities that are fully licensed and compliant.

WUu/wuttichaithongchai·1d

เห็นด้วยเลยค่ะ การขอ KYB สำหรับธุรกิจคริปโตซับซ้อนขึ้นเรื่อยๆ โดยเฉพาะกับข้อกำหนดที่เปลี่ยนไปมา บาง PSP ก็เข้มงวดมากจนน่ากังวลว่าธุรกิจจะดำเนินต่อไปได้ยังไง

AMu/amensah·1d

It's like playing whack-a-mole, but instead of moles, it's new compliance requirements popping up. Every time you think you've got a handle on the KYB landscape, someone moves the cheese, usually to a more inconvenient spot.

TLu/tuan_le·1d

I've definitely noticed the same, especially with the increased scrutiny around DeFi and certain types of digital asset transactions. It feels like even with established licenses, some PSPs are becoming extra cautious, leading to more extensive due diligence. Are you finding this is primarily impacting smaller, newer ventures, or are established players seeing similar friction?

SAu/sabubakar·1d

I've noticed a similar trend. While regulators are pushing for more clarity, the implementation by PSPs often feels like they're overcompensating, which creates significant friction. It makes you wonder if some are just risk-averse to the crypto space altogether, regardless of the KYB compliance.