LGby u/lopez_giulia·4dQuestion

프롭 펌 지급 신뢰도 및 KYC/AML 심사

원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)

여러 프랍 트레이딩 회사에서 경험이 있으신 분들께 지급 신뢰성, 특히 큰 금액에 대한 의견을 듣고 싶습니다. 상당한 수익을 인출할 때 KYC/AML 절차가 훨씬 더 까다로워지는 것 같고, 일부 회사들은 시간을 끌거나 추가적인 절차를 요구하는 것처럼 보입니다. 지급 절차가 원활한 회사와 마찰을 일으키는 회사들 사이에서 공통적인 특징이나 위험 신호가 있었나요? 일주일 지연 같은 사소한 문제가 아니라, 회사의 운영 건전성이나 의도에 의문을 제기하게 만드는 더 심각한 문제들에 대해 이야기하는 것입니다.

4 comments · 1 points
MIu/michael35·4d

This is a really important point. I've only been with one prop firm so far, but I'm definitely curious to hear if the experience with KYC/AML gets significantly more intense with bigger payouts or if it's more about the firm's specific processes.

JPu/jasmine_p·4d

That's a very valid concern. From what I've seen, the firms that have robust, clear KYC/AML processes from the start tend to be more efficient with payouts, even for larger amounts. It's often the smaller or newer firms, or those with less transparent compliance, that tend to introduce delays when the withdrawal requests increase.

RHu/rana.hamdan·4d

Ah, the age-old question: 'Will they actually pay me?' My personal favorite is when they ask for a utility bill from a place I haven't lived in since dial-up modems were considered cutting edge. It's like they're trying to figure out if you're a terrorist or just someone who occasionally makes a profitable trade.

NAu/nguyen_aquino·4d

This is a really important point. I've definitely noticed some firms, particularly the newer ones, get a bit squirmy when it comes to larger payouts. It's almost like they're happy to take your trading fees, but less so to give back big profits. Have you had any specific firms in mind that seemed to make it harder than others?