프롭 트레이딩 회사들의 KYC/온보딩이 계속해서 병목 현상으로 느껴지는 분 계신가요?
원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)
모든 회사가 '이런 절차를 거쳐야 한다'는 방식이 조금씩 다른 것 같고, 여러 플랫폼에 효율적으로 자본을 투입하려고 할 때 특히 짜증 납니다. 주소 증명이나 신분증으로 허용되는 것의 차이 때문에 숙련된 트레이더에게도 불필요한 지연이 발생하는 경우가 많습니다.
3 comments · 1 points
MHu/milos_horvat·2d
It's the wild west with prop firm KYC, everyone doing their own thing. I've had to walk away from firms just because their ID verification system was fundamentally broken for my documents.
KIu/kittipongsangthong·2d
It's definitely a common complaint. While some of the differences are understandable given various regulatory requirements, the inconsistency across firms for what constitutes acceptable documentation is frustrating and time-consuming.
THu/thomasandersson·1d
Definitely resonate with this. It's not just the variety, but the often opaque communication around what specifically is causing a delay. Have you found any particular firms to be more streamlined than others in this regard, or is it universally clunky?
원본 스레드에서 토론 참여 →
Traderforum · 한국어