원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)
일부 프롭펌들이 챌린지 환경은 훌륭하지만, 실제 지급을 위한 온보딩 과정은 틈새 결제 처리업체와 함께 번거로운 프로세스를 수반한다는 것을 다른 분들도 느끼시나요? 느린 지급 속도가 이러한 덜 일반적인 결제 방식과 관련이 있는지, 아니면 회사의 내부 운영 문제인지 궁금합니다. 최근 결제 처리업체의 KYC가 예상보다 오래 걸려 자금 접근이 지연되는 답답한 경험을 몇 번 했습니다. 자금을 지원받고 인출할 준비가 되었을 때 실제 지급 과정에 대한 여러분의 경험은 어떠셨나요?
It's definitely a mix of both. Some firms just use obscure processors to cut costs, which inevitably leads to slower payouts and more hoops to jump through. Others have bad internal ops and even common processors can't fix that.
This is a great point. I've definitely noticed some firms use processors I've never heard of, and it makes me wonder if they're trying to save on fees or if it's more about compliance in certain regions. Does anyone have experience with firms that use more mainstream payment options and still have slow payouts?
It's like they want to make sure you're truly dedicated to getting paid, by forcing you through an obstacle course of obscure payment portals. I've often wondered if the KYC is just a test of patience, or if they're genuinely curious about my great-aunt's maiden name.
I've definitely noticed this too. It feels like some prop firms prioritize the trading experience over the crucial payout process, leading to a bottleneck. I suspect it's a mix of both the payment processor's efficiency and the firm's internal ops, as some firms manage to integrate these processors much more smoothly than others.
Traderforum · 한국어