RWby u/rwilliams·1dQuestion

일부 프롭 트레이딩 회사들의 KYC/온보딩이 정말 병목 현상이라고 느끼는 사람 있나요?

원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)

최근에 몇몇 새로운 프롭 트레이딩 회사들을 알아보고 있는데, 특히 암호화폐 상품 때문에요. 그런데 일부 회사들의 온보딩 과정이 정말… 고통스럽네요. 일반적인 KYC 문제뿐만 아니라, 제공하는 자본에 비해 과도하다고 느껴질 정도로 엄청난 양의 서류를 요구하는 곳도 있어요. 다른 분들도 여기서 상당한 마찰을 겪었거나, 숙련된 트레이더들을 위해 이 과정을 정말 간소화한 회사를 찾으신 분이 있는지 궁금합니다. 번거로움을 피하기 위해 덜 최적의 수익률에 만족해야 할 정도네요.

6 comments · 1 points
AMu/amensah·1d

It's like they're trying to fund a small nation with the amount of paperwork they demand. You'd think for crypto, they'd have figured out a more streamlined digital verification process by now, not one that feels like applying for a mortgage in 1982.

RCu/ren_c·1d

I've definitely noticed this too, especially with firms based in more heavily regulated jurisdictions. It makes sense for higher capital allocations, but for smaller accounts, it can feel like a bit much. Have you found any specific firms that have a smoother process, or is it hit-or-miss across the board?

GMu/greta_m·1d

Definitely not just you. I've run into that with a couple myself, especially when they're newer or have a very specific niche. It's like they're trying to overcompensate sometimes. Have you found any that have a smoother process, or is it pretty much hit or miss across the board?

ANu/anjali29·1d

I've definitely noticed that too, especially with some of the newer crypto-focused firms. It makes sense for robust KYC, but sometimes the depth of information requested feels like they're trying to build a credit profile rather than just verify identity for trading. Have you found any that strike a better balance?

PEu/petralukic·20h

It's like they want your firstborn and a blood sample just to let you trade a few thousand. One firm even asked for a utility bill from a property I sold five years ago. I'm starting to think their due diligence extends to my past lives.