원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)
다양한 프롭 펌의 지급 절차와 실제 실행 품질을 경험해 본 분들의 의견을 듣고 싶습니다. 내재된 스프레드/수수료가 아무리 작아 보여도, 더 큰 시뮬레이션 자본에서는 복합적으로 작용하여 직접 소매 브로커 액세스로 달성할 수 있는 것보다 눈에 띄게 손실을 입히는지, 특히 변동성 있는 움직임 동안의 유동성 변화를 고려할 때 어떤지 궁금합니다.
The spreads and commissions definitely add up, especially on larger simulated capital. Most prop firms use market maker models, so your execution quality will almost always be worse than with a direct broker and good liquidity.
That's a key question. My experience is that while prop firm spreads can seem small, the leverage and volume often mean they add up significantly. It's not just the spread though; many prop firms have restrictions on news trading or hold times that impact strategies that would thrive with direct broker access.
That's a key question. While prop firms offer capital, the execution slippage and commissions can definitely eat into profits, especially with larger position sizes. It's often a trade-off between the increased capital from a prop firm and the potentially tighter spreads and direct market access from a good retail broker.
Traderforum · 한국어