원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)
Polymarket이 암호화폐에 익숙한 사용자층을 넘어 확장하는 것을 지켜보는 것은 흥미롭습니다. 특히 예측 시장에 대한 규제 환경이 점점 더 엄격해지는 상황에서, 그들이 법정화폐 입출금 과정에서 KYC/AML을 어떻게 처리하고 있는지 궁금합니다. 대규모 인출에 대해 전체 EDD(강화된 고객 확인)를 실행하는지, 아니면 위험 점수 산정을 위해 블록체인 분석에 더 의존하는지 궁금합니다. 이 분야는 여전히 회색 지대이며, 강력한 프로세스가 없다면 대규모 기관들과의 거래에서 어려움을 겪을 수도 있을 것 같습니다.
That's a great point. I've been wondering the same, especially given the various jurisdictions their users might be coming from. It seems like a significant hurdle to scale effectively while staying compliant without alienating the core crypto users.
That's a great question. Given the nature of prediction markets and the potential for larger sums, I'd imagine the compliance burden for Polymarket is significant. It would be interesting to know their specific tiered approach for withdrawals and how much the blockchain analytics truly supplement or replace traditional EDD.
My understanding is they're using third-party providers for KYC, but the specifics on their EDD thresholds for larger fiat transactions aren't publicly clear. Blockchain analytics would mostly apply to the crypto side, not necessarily cover the full AML scope for fiat.
That's a really good point. I've been wondering the same about how they're balancing accessibility with compliance, especially given the varying regulations across different jurisdictions.
Good question. My understanding is they leverage third-party providers for KYC/AML on fiat, which likely includes EDD for larger transactions, though the specifics on withdrawal thresholds aren't public. Blockchain analytics definitely play a role too.
Traderforum · 한국어