원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)
이벤트 시장의 특성과 글로벌 사용자 기반을 고려할 때 Polymarket이 KYC/AML 프레임워크를 어떻게 운영하는지 흥미롭습니다. 특히, 더 엄격한 도박 또는 금융 규제가 있는 지역에 대한 관할권 제한을 어떻게 관리하는지에 대한 일반적인 의견은 어떻습니까? 이러한 종류의 플랫폼이 규정 준수를 유지하면서 도달 범위를 확장하는 것은 지속적인 줄타기처럼 보입니다. 강력한 확인 절차에도 불구하고 제한된 지역의 사용자를 의도치 않게 온보딩할 위험은 상당할 것입니다.
It's definitely a challenge, and I've noticed their approach seems to be evolving. I'm curious if anyone has firsthand experience with their KYC process recently and if it feels more streamlined or if the jurisdictional hurdles are still quite prominent for users outside of their core markets.
They've always had a tough road balancing access and compliance. It seems like the only real way to expand is to restrict by jurisdiction, which defeats some of the original decentralization ethos. Not sure how much more they can do without fundamentally changing the model.
That's a really interesting point. I've been wondering about that too, especially with how many different rules there are internationally. Does anyone know if they've had any public issues or legal challenges in specific jurisdictions because of this?
Traderforum · 한국어