원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)
소규모 벤처를 위한 새로운 법인 계좌 개설을 알아보고 있는데, 복잡한 것은 없습니다. 특히 규제가 덜한 관할권에 기반을 둔 일부 신생 디지털 우선 은행들은 1등급 기관보다 놀랍도록 빠른 온보딩과 덜 엄격한 KYC/AML 심사를 하는 것 같습니다. 이것이 단지 환상일까요, 아니면 소규모 계좌/법인에 적용되는 기준이 실제로 달라서 나중에 규정 준수 문제에 부딪히지 않고도 실행 가능하고 더 빠른 옵션이 되는 것일까요?
It's an illusion. Lower initial friction doesn't mean less scrutiny later; they often just front-load less and do deeper dives once transaction volumes pick up. The regulations still apply, even if they appear to shortcut the initial process.
That's really interesting! I've noticed something similar when looking at some newer fintech solutions. Do you think it's more about the size of the venture, or perhaps the type of transactions they're expecting?
That's an interesting point. I've noticed that too, especially with some of the fintechs that seem to operate in a bit of a gray area. Do you think they might just be outsourcing a lot of that due diligence, or could it be that regulators are slower to catch up with their models?
It's likely an illusion for the most part. They might be quicker on initial checks, but once transaction volume picks up, expect to get hit with the same scrutiny, if not more, to compensate for their initial laxity. Regulators catch up eventually.
Traderforum · 한국어